qualify for a promotion, what is least expected of an employee is to have an unblemished record, said the bench of justice SV Gangapurwala and justice Shrikant custodia samsung tab2 Kulkarni. In April 2018, the departmental samsung x cover 3 custodia promotion committee has held him eligible as he was samsung s7 edge custodia silicone found guilty in a disciplinary proceeding. In November 2017, custodia samsung j36 his increment was ordered to be withheld without any cumulative effect on his future increments.
Sangvikar moved custodia cover samsung j1 3d samsung galaxy a6+ the high court after the MAT negozio cover samsung rejected his plea in March 2019. He challenged the validity of the GR contending that custodia samsung 3 s neo it was arbitrary, illegal and violative of the constitutional mandate custodia per samsung galaxy s advance i9070 of equality. It was custodia samsung s10+ also argued on his behalf that he could not have been custodia per tablet samsung sm t805 denied a promotion, as no disciplinary proceeding was pending against him at the relevant time.
The high court, however, rejected the argument. It said when an officer is found guilty in a departmental proceeding, the imposition of punishment is with custodia samsung tab 4 10 pollici an object to improve his conduct and to enforce discipline. of promotion in such circumstance is not a penalty but a necessary consequence of his conduct, said the bench.
The bench noted that the DLC took into consideration amazon cover samsung s2 plus that at the relevant time, his punishment was not over. Besides, he had not been debarred for promotion and galaxy s6 cover samsung custodia per tablet back cover samsung galaxy s4 samsung tab 4 could be samsung galaxy core 2 g355h custodia considered after the period of punishment is over in June samsung galaxy trend plus gt-s7580 custodia 2020.
is, therefore, no discrimination found in the matter of cover samsung note 9 mediaworld promotion of custodia portafoglio samsung j7 2017 the present petitioner, said the bench. cannot be expected from any administration to reward an employee with a promotion during his period of sentence. As such, we do not find any arbitrariness in the decision taken by the departmental promotion committee (DPC). bench also held that the policy contained in the GR was in larger public interest, keeping in mind difficulties faced by various departments dealing with such employees…